Last tuesday, the Hall of Fame Veteran’s Committee voted to keep Ron Santo out of the Hall for one reason or another. Of course, they have their motivations, whether it’s because Ronnie had a habit of clicking his heels at third base during the ‘69 season (bad juju if you ask me) or because he’s seen as a shameless self-promoter among baseball royalty (as if Joe Morgan is some sort of model of humility), he’s not getting in for at least another 2 years.
You may notice that among my examples, I failed to mention a reason including anything that went on during the actual games that he played in. If the Veteran’s Committee wants to keep Santo out for extra-curricular purposes, than so be it, but they shouldn’t pretend that it has anything to do with Ronnie’s play at third base over the course of his career. If they voted based solely on performance, he should have been a mortal lock on his first ballot, as his contemporary Brooks Robinson was. In fact, Santo posted far superior offensive statistics to Robinson and was at least comparable defensively. While Robinson was winning the AL MVP in 1964, Santo was having a better year on his way to finishing a distant 8th in the NL race. Let’s take a look at those numbers, shall we? (I’m using the conventional statistics of BA/OBP/SLG/OPS/OPS+ here)Â
Robinson: .317/.368/.521/.889/145
Santo: .313/.398/.564/.962/164
While the batting averages are similar, Santo is significantly better in the other categories. Santo was more patient and put the ball in play more effectively, taking 334 total bases to Robinson’s 319.
As good as Robinson was on defense that season, Santo may have been better. Here, I’m looking at fielding percentage as compared to league fielding percentage and range factor as compared to league range factor (FP/LFP/RF/LRF).
Robinson: .972/.955/2.94/2.76
Santo: .963/.941/3.25/2.60
Wow. Not much difference there, and Santo appears to have the edge in RF, although he naturally had more opportunities based on the amount of strikeouts Orioles pitchers recorded. Both players were All-Stars and won their respective Gold Gloves.
Some might say that 1964 was a fluke year for Santo, that it’s not reflective of his actual career production, to which I’d say that there is more proof to back up my case. The ensuing 2 years were the continuance of offensive peaks for both players, although Santo’s peak would last longer. In 1965, Robinson would finish 3rd in the AL MVP balloting, while Santo would finish 18th in the NL. In 1966, Robinson would again be a finalist, finishing 2nd, while Santo finished 12th. Let’s take a look at exactly what kind of travesty that was:
Robinson:
1965: .297/.351/.445/.796/124
1966: .269/.333/.444/.777/125
Santo:
1965: .285/.378/.510/.888/146
1966: .312/.412/.538/.950/161
As you can see, both players were probably at their best, offensively, from 1964-1966. And if you tell me that there is any comparison here then you’re crazy. Santo’s numbers tower over Robinson’s, and they would continue to do so until Ronnie’s final season in 1974. What’s more is that it’s not even close, Santo would go on to have another great year in 1967 while Robinson would have a typical one, posting very ordinary numbers.
That’s not to say that Robinson was totally inferior to Ronnie, he obviously had career longevity (although you can hardly hold that against Santo, what with the diabetes and all) as well as postseason appearances on his side. Unfortunately, these may very well be the deciding factors in why Robinson was elected nearly unanimously on the first ballot and why Santo received a paltry 3%. In case you were wondering, the career numbers are as follows:
Robinson: .267/.322/.401/.723/104-merely average numbers, not those of a first ballot hall of famer, to be sure.
Santo: .277/.362/.464/.826/125-the numbers stand by and for themselves.
Now we may see why Robinson has campaigned for Ronnie in the past, perhaps he’s a bit embarassed to be in so quickly while Ron has sat at the fence, looking in on the players that he used to dominate both at the plate and in the field. Maybe it’s Robinson’s sense of guilt that has compelled him to speak on behalf of Santo, that would make sense.
But, in the end, Brooks just probably wants to see his friend in the Hall for personal reasons, and ”personal reasons” are what the Veteran’s Committee is all about, right?
 Â